The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant recognized the crime of this case as a crime of this case and has a record of being subject to criminal punishment several times for the same crime, after having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor due to special larceny, etc., the crime of this case was committed again during the repeated crime period, the victim was not agreed, the damage was not recovered, and the court below sentenced a sentence lower than the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court in consideration of the defendant's circumstances, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as a whole, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair since the court below's punishment was too excessive. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.