The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing of the defendant) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes and is in profoundly against the defendant, and is endeavoring to recover from the victims or damage, etc., the sentence of the court below (two months of suspended execution and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime No. 1 as stated in the judgment of the court below) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes during the trial process is favorable.

However, on July 201, 201, the Defendant repeatedly committed fraud against a construction designer company on the part of July 201 and 30 million won against a real estate purchaser service provider on September 2014, 201. The Defendant repeatedly committed fraud by deceiving 30 million won as a loan, and the nature of such crime is not easy but is also good for the commission of the crime or the method of the crime.

In addition, the defendant again committed the crime of fraud as of September 2014, since the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime became final and conclusive, and since each of the crimes of this case, each of the crimes of this case committed with victims, not only agreement with victims but also recovery from damage, and the defendant repeatedly filed a motion for the extended period of time at the court below that the defendant would have failed to reach an agreement with victims, but also failed to attend the court on several designated date without justifiable grounds. The court below sentenced the defendant's appeal to the end of the court below's failure to attend the court on several occasions without justifiable grounds. The defendant filed a request for the extended period of time without any justifiable reason after being served a writ of summons on the trial date, and the date of the sentence is fixed. The defendant was not present at the court with the intention of avoiding the invalidation of the suspended sentence or the restraint of the court, and the defendant is also subject to the same criminal offense as the previous offense, such as embezzlement and the suspended execution.