Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant 1175 of the 2018 Highest 1175 is the person who actually operates the said manpower office as the director of the manpower office located in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C 405.
On February 21, 2017, the Defendant is running a high-profit business with 10% profits of 10% per 10 days to the victim E in the vicinity of the head of the Sinyang-si.
After selling real estate at auction, it is a business that leaves the profit by disposing of it, and if investment is made, 10% of the profit will be made on the 10th day.
B. The one-time investment is trusted and invested.
If the money is required to contact one day before the day, the money will be deducted and the money will be returned.
“.....”
However, in a situation where the enemy was accumulated while operating the above manpower office, the defendant borrowed a large amount of money from F to F with operating funds of the above manpower office and instructed F to pay the money. Thus, even if the victim received the investment money from F, the defendant was planned to use the F with debt repayment, office operation expenses, personal card payment, etc., and there was no intention or ability to return the principal and the profits by investing in the auction business, etc.
Accordingly, on February 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s husband of G via the Nonghyup Bank account (Account Number H) in the name of his husband; (c) received KRW 30 million from the same account on February 22, 2017; and (d) received KRW 10 million from the same account on February 24, 2017; and (c) received KRW 20 million from the same account on March 20, 2017; and (d) received KRW 10 million from the said account on March 23, 2017.
On March 2018, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I (59 years old) at the “D office located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu.” (hereinafter “D”) that “The Defendant would have the right to operate the restaurant at the site of the apartment construction site if he/she is a week.”
However, the defendant is the victim.