logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.23 2013고정1943
상해
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 700,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2011, at around 17:00, the Defendant criticizes the Defendant from the pet in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment 66 dong 201, “Woman is not a human being.” On the 20st half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 20th half of the 200

The Defendant, who received such criticism, she called “I will throw away with no governance.” The Defendant left the victim’s head debt on the floor by cutting off the victim’s head debt on the floor, cut off the chest, arms, legs, etc. on a drinking basis, and left the victim’s arms after cutting down.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as “satise, tensions, etc. of satise,” which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s act does not constitute self-defense for the purpose of defending the present unfair infringement in light of the following: (a) the date and time of issuance of the medical certificate of this case for conviction under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; and (b) the details thereof; and (c) the victim’s statement, etc.; and (d) the Defendant’s act does not constitute self-defense to defend the present unfair infringement.

In full view of these circumstances, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant has committed an injury as stated in its reasoning.

Considering the same criminal records of the defendant, the degree of injury of the victim, the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the circumstances of the crime, etc.

arrow