A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Daegu District Court on April 22, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on February 27, 2011.

On July 18, 2011, the Defendant had no particular property to the extent of receiving a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a crime of fraud, with respect to the intangibles committed by restaurants around April 28, 201 at the Daejeon District Court on July 18, 201, and there was a debt equivalent to KRW 50,000 in financial institutions.

On April 27, 2011, the Defendant became aware of the victim in the coffee shop (mutual omitted) operated by the victim D in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and developed into a de facto marriage. On June 3, 2011, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim lent deposit of KRW 25 million to the Daegu-gu, that there was an economic surplus by creating a church building in the name of “F” in the name of “F” in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu E, thereby deceiving the victim to acquire the property by deceiving him.

On January 2012, the Defendant, at the house living with the victim located in Daegu-gu G, Daegu-gu, 2012, expressed the draft of the lease contract stating that the principal owner of the building located in Gyeongdong-gu, G and the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of KRW 35 million and KRW 8 million, if the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease

However, in fact, although the provisional contract was prepared in the state that 5 million won was paid to the owner of the building located in the summary area of Glllldong-gun as the down payment, there was no plan to open the church, and part of the money received from the victim was intended to lease the building in the Gu and use it as the down payment of the church and use the remainder as the down payment of the church in the personal living expenses of the defendant. Accordingly, even if the victim received the above money from the victim, measures should be taken so that the deposit for the lease can be returned later.