A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months for the crime of forging an official document held by the defendant.

However, for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of the performance of official duties in Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 27, 2016.

On June 2016, the Defendant: (a) found a disabled vehicle sign in the name of the second head of Sinung-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and the first floor parking lot that was issued around March 2012; (b) deleted the number of the non-existing vehicles indicated in the vehicle column; and (c) stated the Defendant’s “E” as the Defendant’s vehicle number using a flexible pen on the spot.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a sign indicating the disabled vehicle for E vehicles in the name of two E vehicles in the name of the Si-Saeung, a public document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) (only between the crimes before and after the judgment becomes final and conclusive and the crimes of forging official documents as judgment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (this refers to the crimes committed before and after the judgment becomes final and conclusive at the same time as the crimes committed before the judgment, the equality in sentencing in the case of judgment, the fact that the confessions are against the defendant's wrongness, the age, sex, family environment, the circumstances after the crimes,

1. The part concerning the crime under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order (the point of uttering of forged public documents);

1. The Defendant: (a) around March 25, 2017, around 17, 2017, 17 U.S. Around the light name car parking zone of the disabled, the Defendant: (b) completed a forged car sign as described in paragraph 1 to use the disabled parking zone; and (c) exercised it by attaching it inside the front glass of the car car owned by the Defendant, as if the sign was genuine.

2. The Defendant forged the above disabled vehicle sign as stated in its reasoning, but according to the evidence, the Defendant’s wife F was driving the above vehicle on March 25, 2017 with his/her child aboard and parked in the above disabled person parking zone. The Defendant did not board the above vehicle at the time.