logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.20 2017고단4891
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On June 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) heard the words “marbing a woman” on the front day of the Maart located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) received a report from the head of the police box affiliated with the Incheon Samsan Police Station Diplomatic Police Station, who called “Ising to go home” from E of the police box called “Ising to go home”; and (c) the above police box E, who received the report from the head of the police box affiliated with the Incheon Samsan Police Station, who called the scene

Before the booming of “,” and assaulted the front part of the bridge E at least five times by walking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the protection of the lives, bodies and property of the people, public peace and order maintenance.

B. On June 1, 2017, at around 20:50 on June 1, 2017, the Defendant assaulted a police box affiliated with the Incheon Samsan Police Station Diplomatic Police Station, who was arrested and detained as a current offender interfering with the performance of official duties, with the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

2. The Defendant, on June 1, 2017, listens to several persons, such as nurses, etc. at the I Hospital’s reception room located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, on the part of the Defendant: (a) the victim police officer E, and the victim G police officers, who openly ask for treatment.

The victims were insultd by consistently referring to “,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to file a criminal complaint and to the closure of a video screen;

1. In cases of obstructing the performance of official duties in accordance with relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (joint crimes of insult in each judgment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Crimes such as assaulting and insulting police officers who have attempted to rescue themselves for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence.

arrow