logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.05 2017고단3317
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 27, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties performed alcohol together within “D cafeteria” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon around 03:30.

E After assaulting E, the victim F, who is the owner of the business at the place, expressed a large voice on the ground that he she saw “the dynasing of alcohol”, and saw a disturbance between about 30 minutes, such as taking the chair on the floor, and thereby interfering with the operation of the said victim’s restaurant by force, such as having customers go to the above restaurant at the place.

2. On April 27, 2017, at around 04:56, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, the police officers at the office of criminal watch keeping at the 104 Incheon Seo-gu Office of Criminal Police Station of the 33rd Musan Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon., for the police officers at the same place, “We are the funch police funch.,” “We are the funch of this funch, the franch.,” and “

Neina

The death shall be the dead.

“Aroundce you avoid disturbance, the border G of the police station tried to take photographs in order to evidence the disturbance, and assaulted twice to the floor of the defective G’s face strongly.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention and suppression of crimes.

3. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from April 27, 2017 to around 04:30 on the same day, and from around 07:00 on the same day, the Defendant dumpeded and fluored by very rough and disorderly words and actions, such as, under the influence of alcohol at the criminal watch room of the 104 Incheon Seo-gu Military Police Station of Busan, the Defendant 104 Incheon, expressed a large speech to police officers for about 2 hours and 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Investigative reports (Interference with the performance of official duties and cancellation of the owner of the government office’s license shall be accompanied by relevant motion picture CDs) and the application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) (the point of disturbance in the official document and

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow