Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the final date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties on June 5, 2013, around 17:33, 2013, Defendant A committed assault, i.e., assaulting that G treat him as a disabled person, and that he did not enter his own horse, while G was reporting that G sloping G (37 years old), a police officer belonging to the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F District Police Station, explained his father of the case in which he received 112 reports.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

"2013 Highest 1693"

1. Around June 19:10 on June 6, 2013, Defendant A’s general traffic obstruction: (a) at the F District of the Yongsan Police Station located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) laid the H (type : Podle-propoper) vehicle at the center of the terro-road intersection in front of the earth; and (c) was asked to move from the police officer to move the rh (type : Pod-proper) vehicle; (d) the Defendant installed the vehicle without disregarding it; and (d) obstructed general traffic for about one hour.

2. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties at the same time and place as the above Paragraph (1) of the same Article, and as the preceding day threatens Defendant A to take the police officer who was a police officer belonging to the F District Police Team for arresting the flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, Defendant A’s assaulted Defendant A, on the face of the above I, with a framework for disinfection once gradsing off, and with a luxed hand, with the right shoulder of the above I, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations.

The Defendants’ special obstruction of the performance of official duties (defensive fact) by the Defendants of the 2013 Go-dan1495, all of whom were deaf-mutes in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and have been frequently engaged in with other hearing-impaireds.

On the other hand, Defendant A on June 5, 2013 and the same month.

6. Staff members of the Yongsan Police Station;