1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the following "paragraph 2". Thus, it shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) each “this Court” portion of the third 19, 20th 19, 20th 20 of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be amended to “Seoul Central District Court”;

(b)the following shall be added between conduct 14 and 15 of the first instance judgment:

【 살피건대, 채무자회생법 제391조 제1호가 정한 부인권의 대상이 되는 행위인 ‘채무자 파산채권자를 해하는 것을 알고 한 행위’라 함은 총채권자의 공동담보가 되는 파산채무자의 일반재산을 파산재단으로부터 일탈시킴으로써 파산재단을 감소시키는 행위뿐만 아니라, 그 행위가 파산채무자의 재산관계에 영향을 미쳐 특정한 파산채권자를 배당에서 유리하게 하고 이로 인하여 파산채권자들 사이의 평등한 배당을 저해하는 이른바 편파행위(偏跛行爲)도 포함된다고 할 것이다(대법원 2004. 1. 29. 선고 2003다40743 판결 등 참조). 】

C. In light of the fact that “In light of the fact that the Plaintiff was not written,” the part of the fifth sentence of the first instance court’s first instance judgment stating that “In light of the fact that the Plaintiff was not written, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to the trial, such as the entries of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the fact-finding results, etc. on the Bank Co., Ltd. of this court, and the circumstance of its assertion, shall be considered.”

In collusion with B, the fifth sentence of the first instance court's "in collusion with B" of the fifth sentence of the first instance court's judgment, as well as the recognition of the fact that B's general property is reduced at least due to the above acts, and it may interfere with equal distribution among bankruptcy creditors, thereby infringing on the interests of bankruptcy creditors.