1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 14,297,700 won.

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the cases where a part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The part concerning Defendant B, “Defendant C” and “Defendant C” in the second instance judgment of the first instance court is called “Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) and “Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

(b) each part of the second, fourth, and fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendants" shall be written by "G";

C. The fifth and second parts of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

E. On June 19, 2015, the Defendants drafted a written confirmation that “I consent to the Plaintiff (A) to transfer the remaining construction cost of the instant case to the Plaintiff.” On June 29, 2015, the Defendants drafted a written confirmation to adjust the remaining construction cost (Evidence A No. 4), which includes the content that “I consent to the Plaintiff (A).” On June 29, 2015, the Defendants drafted a written confirmation (Evidence A No. 6; hereinafter “instant confirmation”).

A person shall be appointed.

(d) No. 5 of the judgment of the first instance court was written with the phrase “No. 3, 4, and 6 of the first instance court’s 5 pages.”

E. The 5th judgment of the court of first instance stated that the Defendant “the Defendant” portion on the 7th judgment of the court of first instance is jointly and severally against the Plaintiff.

F. On April 27, 2006, the part regarding “Supreme Court Decision 2005Da64870 Decided April 27, 2006” (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Da63870, Apr. 27, 2006) was written by the court of first instance 5.

(g) Beginning 18th to 9th of the fifth decision of the first instance shall be taken in the following manner:

【The Plaintiff performed the instant construction work in accordance with the contract for the instant construction work, the construction cost of which is KRW 1,400,000,000, as to the instant case, and the Defendants’ instant construction work.