The appeal by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The scope of the judgment in this Court rendered a claim in the first instance for the payment of the construction cost, and the Defendant filed a counterclaim seeking damages in lieu of the repair of defects. The claim in this Court partially accepted the claim in this lawsuit, the remainder of the claim in this lawsuit was dismissed, and the remainder of the counterclaim was partially accepted and dismissed.

For this reason, only the plaintiff filed an appeal regarding the part against the plaintiff among the counterclaims, so this Court's judgment is limited to the part against the plaintiff's appeal.

2. The reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows, except for adding a judgment on the allegations emphasized by the Plaintiff in this court (b). As such, the reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part concerning the counterclaim (paragraphs 1 and 3) among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the part concerning the counterclaim (paragraphs 1 and 3); and (b) thereby, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of

The highest court's decision 3 1-2 of the first instance court's decision is as follows.

C. Around January 5, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the solar power plant of this case. On May 24, 2016, the Defendant sent a content-certified mail to the Plaintiff to the effect that “the instant solar power plant is defective, so that the instant solar power plant may cause a defect in reconstruction.”

Each entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 in the 3th three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be described as "the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1".

Each "The 13th 13th 13th am and 21th am and the 13th am and the 13th am and the 13th am and the am and the 13th am and the am and the am and the am and the am and the am and am

After the first instance court's decision 4th 6-7th 6th 7th 2010, "the first instance court's decision" is added to "the seventh 2018.17th 201," and "this judgment" in the same 8th 8th 2nd 8th 201.

B. The Plaintiff asserts that the first instance appraiser D, even if the solar power plant of this case was constructed in the design drawing, may partially occur. When the solar power plant of this case was constructed in the design drawing, the Plaintiff is in the case where the solar power plant of this case was built in the design drawing.