logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.01.24 2016고정902
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of C Carren car.

On June 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 13:55 on June 20, 2016, and proceeded along the left-hand turn way from the west apartment located in the direction of the Asia at the front city to the string apartment located in the direction of the Asia.

At all times, since the signal, etc. is a private-distance intersection, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed by complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the straight line in violation of the signal, caused the collision between the part adjacent to the driver's license of the victim D(37) driver's driver's vehicle's above car rental car driver's side of the driver's license and the part adjacent to the driver's license of the driver's license in front of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the victim's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the 54 years old.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim D in the above occupational negligence by injury to brain-dead sugar, etc., which does not have any wound within two weeks of open medical treatment, and injury to the victim F, such as diversal diversal diversous salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. An investigation report (related to a video product of a lacing accident of Ma2 Vehicle);

1. Blue bbbbox images CDs for damaged vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accident scene and vehicle photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow