1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 15,096,127, and KRW 2,400,000 for each of the said money, the Defendant shall start from July 9, 2014 to July 2019.

Facts of recognition

On July 9, 2014, around 16:55, the Defendant: (a) operated a thring of the G Trop XG car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) on the side of the G Trop road in the middle section of the road from Frop road, and (b) checked the front side and the left side of the instant vehicle, verified the safety of the course, and proceeds safely; (c) in turn, the Plaintiff’s bicycle riding along the bicycle left side of the instant vehicle without any specific safety gear from the left side of the instant vehicle was taken over as the front part of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” Plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as 10-19% of the physical surface that requires treatment for about eight weeks due to the instant accident, such as images and chills, etc. Plaintiff A hospitalized in H Hospital from July 9, 2014 to September 3, 2014, and was under treatment at H Hospital. At present, he/she had been hospitalized in the right upper part of the front part (11 x8 m), reflective reflectors (7 x 4 m) of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part (5 x 3m), reflect reflects on the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part (5 x 3m), reflective reflects on the upper part of the upper part of the upper part (5 x 2 x 13m), buckbucks on the right part (15 x 157 mm).

The I Co., Ltd. entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle from October 1, 2014 to July 4, 2016, paid KRW 29,552,950 in total to the hospital treating the Plaintiff A for medical expenses.

On the other hand, Plaintiff B and the Network J (hereinafter “the deceased”) are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Deceased died of food cancer on November 4, 2015.

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including a branch number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the result of the physical appraisal commission to K Hospital funeral of this court, as a result of the overall purport of the pleading, and the fact that the accident in this case occurred as a result of the defendant's negligence of operating the vehicle in this case without neglecting the duty of Jeonju City, and thus, the defendant is the plaintiff B and the deceased.