A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment with prison labor in Busan District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 14, 2013.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, who actually owns C, obtained a loan of apartment houses No. 202, No. 101, No. 202, the second floor of the building No. 101, the building No. 101, the second floor of the building No. 101, which was owned by the Defendant, as security, had attempted to obtain a security loan by manipulating as if only C is residing in the above apartment house

1. For the purpose of uttering, on March 22, 201, the Defendant modified the official document, without authority, one copy of the statement of perusal of the occupying household under the name of the head of the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City Dong-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

2. On March 22, 2011, the Defendant presented the following as if he/she was issued a true statement of the transfer household inspection as stated in paragraph (1) to the above loan manager, when he/she requested a borrower to inspect the transfer household in the documents evidencing the loan from the Young-gu World Trade Union located in 1058-2, Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, 1058-2.

3. Around March 22, 2011, the defrauded applied for a loan as security by an apartment building No. 202 of the second floor of the building D in the name of the Defendant, which was owned by the Defendant, at the above victim’s monthly credit cooperative, and issued a detailed statement of transfer household inspection altered as stated in paragraph (1) as if it were actually issued.

However, in fact, in the above apartment house, the tenant E was residing, and the details of the occupancy household inspection was modified as stated in Paragraph 1.

Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is against the victim.