logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 12. 09. 선고 2010두18598 판결
주식 명의신탁은 조세법률주의 실질과세원칙 과잉금지의 원칙에 반하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu2076 (Law No. 14, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2008Do1824 ( December 18, 2008)

Title

It does not go against the principle of no taxation without the law of no taxation without the substance over form principle.

Summary

Since a stock title trust contributes to preventing use as a means of concealing a gift or as a means of avoiding a contribution to gift tax, it does not go against the principle of the principle of no taxation without the law of no taxation without the law of no taxation.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as

arrow