logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.06.25 2020가합400829
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 450,000,000 as well as 30% per annum from December 31, 2009 to October 25, 201, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the claim is as shown in the annexed sheet of claim

(2) Applicable provisions of the Civil Procedure Act: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (by public notice)

3. Part of the term “A” appears to have claimed damages for delay at the rate of 30% pursuant to Article 5 of the No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 notarial deed (However, from October 26, 201, the Plaintiff claimed damages for delay at the rate of 25%). The maximum interest rate pursuant to the Interest Limitation Act shall be 30% per annum from June 30, 2007 to July 14, 2014 [the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Act No. 12227, Jan. 14, 2014; hereinafter “former Interest Limitation Act”).

(1) Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act, Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25376, Jun. 11, 2014); Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25376, Jul. 15, 2014); from July 15, 2014 to February 7, 2018; Article 25% (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28413, Nov. 17, 2017); Article 2(1) of the former Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28413, Feb. 8, 2018) is 24% per annum (the Interest Limitation Act; Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act; Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act); and the portion of damages for delay in excess is null and void.

arrow