1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence presented by the defendant to the court of first instance was presented to this court

Therefore, the reasoning of this court is as follows, and the defendant, as the ground for appeal, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for supplement of the judgment as to the DaNN, especially as to the DaNN, which is the ground for appeal of this court. Thus, it is accepted as it is by the main text

An abbreviationd name set forth in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the first instance shall be used below the same as it is.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The 3rd page 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the 3rd page “B” and the 3rd page 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance (the trade name at the time was changed to J on October 1, 2018, and the status in the lawsuit of this case was comprehensively succeeded to the Plaintiff by the J on October 1, 2018 as a result of the division and establishment of A.

Part 5 of the first instance judgment, part 12 "H" is raised to "G".

The last 7th sentence of the first instance judgment is "217 years" as "2017".

The "7,168,650 won" in the 7th sentence of the first instance judgment shall be "7,163,650 won".

From the 8th sentence of the first instance judgment, the term "non-product" in the sixth sentence shall be raised as "non-product".

Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "No. 18" in Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance with "No. 18, 22, and 29".

Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term "the front line" in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "the front line to the front line".

In the first instance judgment, the "No. 18" of the first instance judgment is raised as "No. 18".

Once the judgment of the first instance is rendered, the following shall be added to the third following:

The third City Mayor is responsible for the plaintiff to maintain and manage the ice listing of this case.