beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the defendant and the defendant assistant intervenor are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be those resulting from the participation in the appeal;
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or replacement of part of the grounds of the judgment below as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article
2. Parts in height:
(a) On the seventh anniversary of the second box, the “recoverage” in the seventh box shall be raised to “number of times”;
(b) in the 8th box, the second box strengthening “satisfying” shall be regarded as “satisfying the inspection”;
(c) from the 8th following, the sum of paragraphs 1 and 2, “the shares will be attached to the beginning by the knives day”, “the shares will be attached to the front process by the knives day.”
3. Parts changed;
A. From the 9th day to the 3th day, the “in the process of the examination of the instant case” was changed to the “in the process of the examination of the first instance court”.
(b) from the 12th page, the term “witness” is replaced by the term “witnessness of the first instance trial”.
C. From No. 13 to No. 3 and No. 4, “from No. 3 and No. 4,” the personnel members of the No. 3 and No. 4 were changed to the effect that it is difficult for the personnel members of the No. 3 and No. 4 to hold the Plaintiff responsible for the inspection of external appearance at the Disciplinary Review Committee of the Plaintiff. The witness of the first instance trial testimony that the Plaintiff is related to the sample, and the witness U of the first instance trial testimony that the Plaintiff was responsible for the inspection of external appearance, and the witness of the grassland and the brine process did not discover the appearance of the instant surplus.”
From the 13th day to the 14th day, the "Unexploitability to find" is changed to the "unexploitability to find".
E. From the 14th following to the Plaintiff’s “B” to “B” to “B” to “B,” to “B,” to “B,” to the witness X’s testimony to re-examine the entries in each written confirmation written by workers who work in the course of bed, W, and X and the contents of each such written confirmation.”