logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.28 2015나2183
철거 등
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and defendant C are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and all of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment ] Part 3-Class 20-Class 4 of the 3-Class 1 of the 3-Class 20-Class 4, "The video and this court" shall be "each video and the court of first instance".

The 5th page 8's "astronomical administration" shall be changed to "Yacheon".

Part 6 "exclusive use" in Part 20 shall be changed to "exclusive use".

Each "astronomical" in the 7th page 2-3 shall be deemed to be each "astronomical Chief", and "electric distribution board" shall be deemed to be "electric distribution team".

In the 7th page, "Acol" in the 20th place shall be raised as "Acol".

Part 8 1 written “A 3” shall be deemed to read “B 1 to 55 each entry of evidence 3-3”.

Part 8, "this Court" in Part 4 shall be changed to "Court of First Instance".

Part 8-9 to 10 T. B’s “A No. 3” is raised as “B 1 to 55”.

Part 8, "Removal of Partitions" in Part 17 shall be raised as "Removal of Partitions".

Part 8 "Co-ownership" in Part 20 shall be understood as "part-time Section for Common Use".

The defendant C in the second sentence of the 9th page “Defendant C” shall be deemed to be the plaintiffs.

The 9th page 10 "each person" shall be referred to as "each person".

Nos. 13-14 of the 9th page 13-14 " alone is the entry of evidence Nos. 6 and 15 of the A, and the testimony of the trial witness J alone."

Part 9 14-15 written “B” shall be deemed to read “B” to read “B 1 to 4 written evidence 5-1 to 5.”

Part 9 18 "The video of No. 13 of the A shall be viewed as "the video of No. 13 of the A" only by the video of No. 13 to 5 of the A. 13.

2. If so, the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant C is justified within the above scope of recognition.

arrow