logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.09.25 2012고단3283
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for two years, Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year, Defendant C’s imprisonment for ten months, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2012 Highest 3283】 The Defendants, on the first floor of the building located in the Busan East-guJ, operated a game room and exchanged the result of the game. Defendant A provided a game room, Defendant C provided a game room, Defendant C provided a game machine, Defendant D provided a game machine, and Defendant B provided a exchange according to the points given when customers using the game room wishing to exchange, Defendant B provided 50% of the proceeds of the game room, Defendant A and Defendant C provided 25% of the proceeds of the game room, Defendant A and Defendant C provided 10,000 won per day.

From the end of June 201 to August 19:30, 201, the Defendants installed 100 game machine “dlimgs” in K located on the first floor of the said building, and employed L, M, N,O as an employee, and caused customers to put into the game machine and play the game.

In addition, according to the form of the game machine screen card, points have been given to customers according to the number of points obtained, one copy of the reuse certificate per 10,000 points has been issued, and then the reusable certificate has been exchanged in cash.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in speculative acts using game products and engage in business of exchanging game results.

[2012 Highest 4963] On May 2010, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “The situation where it is necessary to take money by taking a large amount of money and making money an election in Busan Highest Round to the victim Q Q at the Busan East-gu Pcafeteria is an opportunity to enter the port transportation union now. The employee will take employment as an air transportation union member if he/she takes 20 million won per person for employment.”

Since then on June 1, 2010, the Defendant requested the Defendant to have the Victim Q Q employed the Victim S and the Victim’s wife T as a port union member at the Busan Dong-gu Ssing S and the Victim’s wife at the Defendant’s port union. The Defendant provided the Victim with “40 million won as a port union member” to the Defendant, and the Victim also provided the Defendant with T as a port union member.

arrow