Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding Facts] B held office as the head of the Trade Union of Busan Metropolitan City (State), from August 1, 2001 to August 31, 2016, and concluded with the company and labor-management council on behalf of the branch in accordance with the rules of the National Federation of Local Bus Workers on behalf of the branch, and entered into a wage negotiation and various group agreements on behalf of the members through labor-management consultation with the company and the labor-management council. In particular, E is a person with the authority to recommend employees to the company at the time of hiring regular workers and re-contract with the contracting affiliated members. E is a person who worked as the bus driver of the above D's bus from August 1, 2001 to August 31, 2009 and was not elected but was detained for the election of the head of the Trade Union of Korea on December 19, 2016.

On the other hand, F was elected in the election of the head of the branch office in March 23, 1996 after being employed as a bus driver in the above D on March 23, 1996, and now D's old-age branch office, G, H, the Defendant, I, and J are all D's bus officers, and K is L's bus officers and M are N's bus officers.

[2] The Defendant and H recruited the Defendant as a full-time bus engineer in D by offering money and valuables to the head of the Trade Union Branch B with the authority to employ a bus engineer in D.

On July 2014, the Defendant and H issued KRW 10,000,000 to the above E in return for soliciting the Defendant to work as a bus engineer for the Defendant through E, at the close frequency of the D nearby Busan Shipping Daegu C, around Busan.

After that, around September 2014, the above E solicited the defendant to be employed by the defendant's D urban bus article No. B, and the defendant passed the interview on January 2016 and decided not to receive five million won of the existing bonds to be received from B as the defendant passed the interview.

Accordingly, in collusion with H and E, the Defendant offered property in collusion with H and E, while making an illegal solicitation in relation to the job of the bus engineer B.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;