logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.20 2017고단5581
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the proprietor of “D Gameland” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu and the second floor, with which a outdoor game machine, which has not been deliberated upon, was installed. E, as an employee of the said “D Gameland,” the Defendant has overall control over the duties of the game site, and E, in charge of the preparation of a business site and exchange, recruited to operate the game site.

1. No one who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. shall engage in speculative acts using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than speculative acts under the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc.;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from around December 29, 2016 to July 5, 2017, set up 40 games in the said “D Gameland,” and operated a game hall in such a way as to allow customers finding the place to put in cash and make them play a game, and, if the 3 short-term screen is in accord, put a certain point on the 4,500 won per page, put a card discharged according to the 4,500 won.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with E to engage in speculative activities by using speculative machines other than speculative activities.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry shall engage in a business of exchanging or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a massage game room at the date and time and place specified in the E and the above 1, caused customers to put cash to play a game, and exchanged in cash the amount excluding 10% out of the points they acquired.

As a result, the defendant conspired with E to exchange results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect by each prosecutor against the defendant or F;

1. E Prosecutorials, G, H.

arrow