logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.12.14 2017고단371
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry shall provide for the distribution or use of game products which have not been rated by meetings of the game water grade members, or display them for such purposes, and shall exchange, arrange for exchange or re-purchase of the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of a game product for a business;

Nevertheless, on April 20, 2017, from around July 24, 2017 to around July 24, 2017, the Defendant established 16 game “Yemamatoto” game in the game room in the C cafeteria 2, which is a game product that was not classified by a meeting of the water grade members, and provided the game for use by allowing many unspecified customers who found the head of the said game to play the game, and exchanged it into KRW 5,00 per cash per point obtained through the use of the said game product.

2. No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. shall engage in speculative acts as a business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than speculative business;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, set up 16 games, and, if many unspecified customers who found the place pay 10,000 won in cash, paid 50 points to them, and then, the customers divided the burners installed in the said game machine, with the same shape on the screen of the game machine by a chance, and if the line corresponds with a large line, he/she engaged in speculative activities that inflict economic benefits or losses on the users by using a speculative machine in accordance with the same number of lines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow