logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.09.15 2017고단1014
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2016, the Defendant, through “B,” a smartphone-making app, contacted with those who want to engage in sexual traffic, and was employed as an employee by introducing C, D, etc., a Russian national female, as an employee.

From July 23, 2016 to August 16, 2016, the Defendant promised time and place for engaging in commercial sex acts with unspecified men who advertised through smartphone-making app “B” and “E, etc., and reported and contacted the advertisement, and moved to a passenger car at the time and place promised with the above Russian nationality women, and made the said women only with the men who promised to engage in commercial sex acts, and had them receive approximately KRW 1.20,00 won for each commercial sex acts and have them do the act of sexual intercourse or similarity, and thereafter, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts three times a day average of KRW 4,300,000 per day by receiving the remainder after deducting KRW 60,000 from the women, thereby raising profits equivalent to the total amount of KRW 4,30,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, such as control sites;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture, and Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are not long-term business period for sentencing, the defendant has no same criminal record, and reflects the defendant, the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, environment, circumstances and results of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered and determined as ordered.

arrow