1. On July 8, 2014, the Defendant issued a decision to grant subsidies to Plaintiffs A, B, C, and D and issued an order to revoke the decision and to return subsidies.

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

The status of Plaintiffs A, B, C, F, and net H (Death on February 3, 201) and Nonparty I are those engaged in the production of facilities in luminous cities; Plaintiff D is the above net H, and Plaintiff E is each spouse of the above I; Plaintiff corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of production, processing, sale, export, etc. of Pacific.

From 2009 to 2012, in order to support the establishment of a steel automation greenhouse for agricultural households specialized in nuclear arts, the Defendant implemented a subsidy project with a subsidy of 40% on the condition that the selected project operator bear the remaining 60% of the project cost. The Plaintiff A, B, C, and the Network H applied for the subsidy under the name of the Plaintiff corporation, Nonparty I, under the name of Plaintiff E, and Plaintiff F, under the name of Plaintiff E, and Plaintiff F applied for the said subsidy to the Defendant.

After the above procedures, the defendant granted subsidies to the selected project operators, and the selection project operators, project operators, and subsidies granted for each project shall be as follows:

(1) The Plaintiff 64050,6409,6409, Plaintiff 64050,640,6409, Plaintiff 640,6409, 200, 400, 400, 600, 600, 600, 600, 400, 600, 600, 600, 600, 300, 600, 600, 4200, 200, 4240, 2010, 4240, 2010, 530, 6360, 640, 640, 640, 640, 60, 640, 6405, 640, 640, 605, 640, 605, 640, 604, 605, 6405, 201.