logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.07.10 2015고단415
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a juvenile game providing business operator who operates the "E" on the second floor of Down-si.

No one shall distribute, provide for use, exhibit or keep game products the contents of which are different from those of the game products rated by the Game Products Management Committee.

Nevertheless, from June 11, 2014 to 19:30 on June 11, 2014, the Defendant classified the above game room as being unable to obtain an item card using an external device, etc. regardless of the user’s ability, from the original game grade committee, from around 16:00 to 19:30 on the same month. However, regardless of the user’s manipulation, the Defendant installed 40 game 2, which was changed to the direction of the part indicating the direction regardless of the user’s manipulation, and provided it to unspecified customers for use.

As a result, the Defendant provided an unspecified number of customers with game products different from the rated game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Answers based on each appraisal result;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry Promotion, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the Defendant did not have awareness that the instant game product was different from that subject to the rating review. However, the Defendant, at the time of the purchase of a game machine, received the automatic monitoring device with the automatic monitoring device at the time of the purchase of the game machine (see, e.g., e., see, e., e., see, e., e., e., see, e., e., Supreme Court Decision 84 through 88).

arrow