beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 25, 2004, the Defendant was punished by a fine of 700,000 won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on July 17, 2008, by a fine of 700,000 won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul East District Court on May 24, 2013, by a fine of 2.5 million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul East District Court on May 24, 2013. On October 24, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment of 6 months at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 1, 2019, which became final and conclusive as of November 1, 2019.
1. Around 22:30 on December 16, 2019, the Defendant driving a Karen vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.170% from the 2km section of approximately 2km to the front road of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, with the frequency of “C” located in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul around 23:05 on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.
2. On December 16, 2019, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) around 23:06, at the front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, the Defendant sought to stop and drive the vehicle in front of the vehicle; (b) the police officers, such as the chief G of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station affiliated with the police box of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station who was called upon receiving a drunk driving report, and the chief H, requested the Defendant to stop and get off the vehicle in front of the vehicle without responding thereto; (c) the Defendant was determined to have a concern that the Defendant might flee; and (d) the Defendant, a slope of the Dongdaemun Police Station affiliated with the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station, was trying to drive the vehicle in front of the vehicle and stop the vehicle at a distance from the rear of the vehicle and stop the course; and (d) the Defendant again requested the Defendant to stop and drive the vehicle because the said G and H are carrying the vehicle behind, but the Defendant continued the vehicle without disregarding the said request and received the front driver of the vehicle patrol in front of the right.
Accordingly, the Defendant patrols the goods used by public offices.