1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a patrol officer on June 10, 1992, and was promoted to the police officer on November 28, 2014. From July 9, 2014, the Plaintiff served in the Eastern Police Agency B and C police boxes.

B. On October 30, 2015, the Plaintiff carried out patrols, such as identifying the place of residence of a person who was carrying out patrols (E) while driving patrols (E), by boarding a police boat D, who is a worker working on the morning.

C. Around 11:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff driven the above patrol vehicle and proceeded along the three-lane road in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the two-lanes from the long distance of Dongdaemun-gu Office to the long distance of East Asia, while entering the same one-lane to the opposite lane, and as is, the Plaintiff continued to drive the said patrol vehicle in excess of the central line.

At this time, the bus vehicle, which is proceeding as one lane from the rear side of the patrol vehicle, was rapidly operated in order to avoid a collision with the above patrol vehicle that rapidly enters the same lane, and six passengers of the bus were in excess of the bus vehicle and were injured.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). D.

The plaintiff went to the patrol car without any measure after the U.S., and returned to the patrol box at the restaurant located outside the designated service area, which is located outside the designated service area.

E. As to the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff reported 112, and the Plaintiff was found to have driven the instant traffic accident-related patrol vehicle at around 14:00 on the same day.

F. The Defendant, based on the following facts, deemed that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 57 (Duty of Reinstatement), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act, and was subject to disciplinary action on the Plaintiff on November 6, 2015, pursuant to Article 78 (1) 1 through 3 of the same Act.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case"). ① The plaintiff shall thoroughly implement the prevention of the self-accident and the basic work due to the issuance of the first emergency duty during the normal session of Korea.