A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the time of committing each of the following crimes, was in bad credit standing equivalent to KRW 76 million, and had no intent or ability to pay construction cost and wages even if he/she did work for another person.

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On August 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B that he would pay the cost of construction at the site of a commercial building located in Daegu-gu Seoul-gu and that he would have the victim B pay the cost of construction at the site of another day for the same week at the site of the building, and that he had the said victim pay two million won for the cost of construction at the site of a commercial building located in Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

B. On August 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement that the victim would be able to pay the cost of construction at the time of the construction of a multi-household located in Daegu-gu Branch of Multi-household D for 15 days at the site of multi-household housing, and that the victim would be able to pay the cost of construction at the time of the third party’s interior works for the third party and did not pay nine million

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

C. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant concluded that the victim would be able to pay the cost of construction at the construction site of a multi-household E in Daegu-gu multi-household E, Daegu-gu, and that the victim would be able to pay the cost of construction at the time of dismissal of the interior works of a third party. The Defendant had the said victim do so and did not pay

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim. D.

On August 8, 2012, the Defendant concluded that the victim would pay the construction cost at the construction site of a multi-household housing located in the Seocho-gu, Daegu, that the victim would have had the victim pay the construction cost at the time when the third party had the third party perform the third party's interior works, and did not pay 1.5 million won to the victim.

In this respect, the defendant has taken advantage of property interest by deceiving the victim.