A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 23, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act at the Changwon District Court on September 23, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 1 of the same year.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a construction business operator who received a subcontract in the name of Section D from Section C, the principal contractor, from May 2010 to December 2010.

The Defendant had lent the above part of the apartment construction work without a construction business license without any particular funds on November 201, 2010. However, the construction cost received from the original contractor was not paid for the loan of the above license, the construction cost to re-subcontracts of the above sub-subcontracts of the above sub-subcontracts, or the unpaid construction cost due to other construction sites. Thus, even if the above part of the construction work is sub-subcontracts to other subcontractors, it was difficult to pay the construction cost on the agreed date even if it is re-subcontracts to other subcontractors.

The Defendant did not explain the above circumstances to the victim E (P) who is the subcontractor in the construction site office of the apartment site in Jin-gu, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, the above temporary border, and did not pay 160,000,000 won out of the agreed construction price when the construction work is completed at the time of the completion of the construction work of the road package work of the above apartment site. As such, the Defendant stated that if the road package work of the above apartment site among the above apartment construction work, the construction work of the above apartment site would be completed, it would be immediately paid. The Defendant did not pay the victim who believed to be the fact that he would have the victim complete the construction work of the above time from the above date to December 2, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 161 million.

Summary of Evidence

1..