logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.08 2018고정1018
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in interior work business.

1. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay construction cost to the victim C at the construction site of Mayang-si B at the construction site of Mayang-si, Seoul, to the victim C at the construction site of 308 May 1, 2015.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the construction cost even after the construction work.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) had the victim perform the construction of the floor; and (c) did not pay the remainder of KRW 11,73,50,000, out of the construction cost to be paid by the victim; and (d) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

2. On July 2, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would pay the victim construction expenses within one month at the construction site of the electric power resource house located in Daldong-gun, and within one month at the construction site of the 42.5 square meters away from the site of the electric power resource house.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the construction cost even after the construction work.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim perform construction works on the floor, and did not pay the construction cost of KRW 2,210,000 to the victim, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

3. On August 11, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the construction site of a new house E located in Gyeyang-gun, the Defendant would build a house owned by the victim. The Defendant would receive a bank loan as collateral on the floor construction site. The Defendant would pay the construction cost.

However, the above address was not owned by the defendant, and even if the construction work was done, there was no intention or ability to pay the construction cost.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim perform the floor construction work, and did not pay the construction cost of KRW 1,659,000, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

4. The Defendant F.M. on September 3, 2015.

arrow