The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the mother of the deceased E (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Defendant C was the spouse of the deceased.

B. On January 18, 2012, the Deceased: (a) sought an explanation from the F Hospital run by Defendant Incorporated Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) that food cancer 4 diagnosis and expected leisure within six months; and (b) sought an explanation from the Defendant Hospital as from January 20, 2012 that food cancer 4 diagnosis and expected leisure within six months.

2. Until September 2, 201, the Defendant hospital emergency room was adopted with an air chemical method, and around 03:50 on March 11, 2012, when the G hospital was receiving treatment at the G hospital after discharge, the Defendant hospital emergency room was located in the main lake of the earth, blood transfusion, and respiratory difficulties.

(c)

The medical team of the Defendant Hospital explained the status of the Deceased by, on March 18, 2012, the Defendant C, the guardian of the Deceased and the Deceased, that there is a risk of astronomical construction of the engine in the city of inserting the crym, and that even if the cryp is inserted, it is impossible to do so. On March 18, 2012, Defendant C signed the written consent on the refusal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNR).

(d)

On March 22, 2012, the Deceased’s room was observed around 16:50 while complaining of a pain on March 22, 2012. At around 17:00, the administration of ambin, Aminomine, and around 17:30, the administration of ambin was suspended. At the request of Defendant C, the administration of all drugs against the Deceased was suspended.

E. The Deceased died on March 22, 2012 around 19:39.

[Grounds for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the Plaintiff alleged to be the deceased complained of extreme pain on March 22, 2012, the Defendant C unfairly requested the suspension of medication against the deceased. The medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital refused the foregoing Defendant C’s unfair demand under medical judgment and had a duty of care to continue to administer the medicine in order to reduce the pain of the deceased, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital suspended the medication at around 17:00, 17:30, 17:30, 18:0, 18:0, 200.