1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,909,090 for Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 1,272,727 for Defendant B, C, D, and E; and (c) for each of them on September 8, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The party’s status network F (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a person who was subject to the labing labing labing labing at the Central University Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is the spouse, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E of the deceased.

B. Around 2008, the Deceased was diagnosed as a pelvis infection and was in charge of the oral medication. Around three months before the Defendant hospital’s entrance, the Deceased was in charge of the oral medication. However, on July 21, 2012, the Deceased was in charge of the administration after the medication. (2) Around July 21, 2012, the Deceased was in charge of the operation and treatment of the normal part of the normal part of the normal part of the body of the Defendant hospital. (3) Around 10:00 on the same day, the Deceased was in the emergency room of the Defendant hospital.

3) As a result of the blood examination of the deceased and the recovery CT examination, the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the deceased's name as an acute dyphosome dypitis, and hospitalized the deceased. 4) The medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital observed the progress by administering the antibiotics to the deceased for the purpose of preventing the second infections, such as dyprying, supplementing the amount of water, and preventing the second infection.

5) Around July 24, 2012, the result of the pympha test on the Deceased did not have a sap sap, but the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital observed the sap sap sap sap, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital confirmed dump infection caused by the sap. 6) On July 23, 2012, the Deceased complained of the pulmonary disorder symptoms, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital provided symptoms to the her symptoms when he administered the urology through circular and sulbin, and around July 30, 2012, the her symptoms and chromatic symptoms were improved. From the perspective of the deceased on July 30, 2012, the condition of the deceased, such as the pressure of the physical examination, and there was no fump.

7. As such, when the deceased’s condition was improved, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital assessed the deceased’s age, respiratory, heart function, and respiratoryly, with respect to liquid substances observed in the heart laps, such as respiratory and breath, breath, chest, and anesthesia pain.