logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.06.25 2013고단2346
자본시장과금융투자업에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of Paragraph 1 of 2013 Highest 3115 and Paragraph 1 of 2013 Highest 4108.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 22, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution on the grounds of violating the Illegal Check Control Act at the Jung-gu District Court on September 22, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 27, 2012.

"2013 Highest 2346"

1. Joint Crimes by Defendant A and Defendant B: The Defendants acquired the F-related crimes with E, without connection with the following grounds, sold at a certain price, issued and sold at a certain price, issued and issued bills, etc., and offered to offer money by using the bill in the name of the State F, which is highly likely to cause the presentation of payment and refusal of payment within a certain period of time (hereinafter referred to as “billed amount of punishment”).

Any person who intends to engage in the business of arranging and guaranteeing purchase and sale of promissory notes with their maturity maturity within one year shall obtain authorization from the Financial Services Commission.

On November 27, 2012, the Defendants, along with E, accepted G as the representative, opened a current account at the roadside branch of the Guro-dong National Bank in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and received the face value at the above bank. At that time, the Defendants issued one promissory note of KRW 232,494,900 at the face value from the French branch of the Guro-gu, Seoul. At that time, until January 2013, including the issuance of one promissory note of KRW 232,49,90 at the face value from the French branch of the above bank. Until January 2013, 2013, the Defendants issued KRW 12,140,01,90 at the face value of each Promissory note of which maturity comes within one year from the date of issuance as shown in attached Table 1 of the Crimes List, issued them, and then acquired the unpaid revenue by selling it as security or by leaving it out as security, and failed to deposit the payment of the said Promissory note, thereby making a F disposition around February 13,

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E and carried out short-term financial business without obtaining authorization from the Financial Services Commission.

2. The business of buying and selling discount notes, the maturity of which comes within 1 year of Defendant B, and the business of accepting and guaranteeing such notes.

arrow