1. All claims filed by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the remaining designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Basic Facts

Scar Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Scarn Construction”) (hereinafter referred to as “Scarn Construction”) between Defendant and Sungsung Art Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seosung Art”).

The Defendant church (the name before the change was referred to as “B church” or “C church”).

Defendant is only referred to as “Defendant”

(3) The term “Cropical Extension Works” is contracted by the Corporation, and the Meteopy Works and the Meteopy Works during the said Works (hereinafter “instant Works”).

3) The contract was subcontracted (one of the above contracts is not known.)

2) 2) Between the Defendant and the Defendant during the execution of the instant construction project (a clearly known person is unclear), Daesung entered into a contract with the content of the instant construction project to change part of the materials into high-class materials, and to implement additional construction works, etc., but the additional construction cost therefrom was to be paid directly by the Defendant to Daesung Art (hereinafter “instant contract”).

3) According to the instant contract, the Defendant remitted part of the construction cost (i) KRW 70 million on May 22, 2012, and (ii) KRW 90 million on June 29, 2012, respectively, to the Sungsung Art, as part of the construction cost, (iii) pursuant to the instant contract, the Defendant suspended the instant construction work on June 30, 2012.

The Plaintiff’s collection order, etc. 1) The Plaintiff and the designated parties are workers at the construction site of the instant case. The Daejeon District Court Decision 2012Gadan48555 rendered a final judgment on January 25, 2013 (a judgment without pleadings). The said judgment became final and conclusive around that time. Meanwhile, on October 24, 2012, the Plaintiff and the designated parties entered the claim amount in the Daejeon District Court 2012Kadan7647 of the attached Table “the amount of the claim” in the attached Table “the amount of the claim” as the amount corresponding to the “amount of the claim transfer” column, and the provisional seizure order was issued against the Defendant of Masung, and the said provisional seizure order was served to the Defendant on October 25, 2012.

3. Since February 18, 2013, the plaintiff and the designated parties are the amount of provisional seizure order of Daejeon District Court 2013TT2285.