1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the amount which orders payment below.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4.

(1) 피고는 2011. 10. 7. 주식회사 한인테크(이하 한인테크라고 한다)와 사이에 피고가 시공 중인 울산 중구 우정동 우정혁신도시 2-3 블록 동원로얄듀크 아파트 신축공사 중 철근콘크리트 공사에 관하여 공사대금을 5,632,379,088원(부가세 포함)으로 하는 하도급계약을 체결하였다.

(2) On January 16, 2012, the said subcontract was terminated by the Defendant’s declaration of intention, and the construction cost of the completed portion to be paid to Handoc at the time was at least KRW 287,547,304.

(3) The Plaintiff and the designated parties are the workers retired while serving in Hando from Korea by January 31, 2012. The overdue wages and retirement allowances payable to the Plaintiff and the designated parties are as listed below.

Serial 12,570,040 3,295,234 15,234 15,865,274 28,320 21,477,942 29,232,480 37,232,480 53,948 13,16,428 428 4,772,810 04,772,810 25,250 E 2,508,150 22,569,777,732,2742, 2742, and 250,000 25,000,000 25,000 25,016,000 25,000,000 25,016,000 25,016,06,000