1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff (designated parties) and the appointed parties each money in the claim column of the attached claim amount sheet.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed) and the designated parties filed a lawsuit seeking wages with the U.S. District Court 2013Da53236 on the ground that the Plaintiff provided labor to B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) and was not paid wages.

B. However, on November 29, 2013, Nonparty Company commenced rehabilitation as the court 2013 Ma245.

(B) On May 15, 2014, the rehabilitation was abolished. (C)

In the above-mentioned District Court High Court Decision 2013Gahap53236, "The administrator C under the law of the company of the non-party to the lawsuit of the company of the non-party to the lawsuit of the company of the non-party to the lawsuit" was sentenced to the judgment that "the amount in the claim column of the attached claim amount sheet shall be paid to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party at the rate of 20% per annum from November 15, 2013 to the date of complete payment" and this became final and conclusive as it is.

(hereinafter “instant judgment”) D.

On the other hand, on March 4, 2013, the Defendant, who was contracted with the Financial Investment Company Y2 Y2 Y2 Y2 Pacific Construction, ordered the Non-Party Company to subcontract D Construction (hereinafter “instant Construction”) among underground structure reinforcement works during the said construction. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, as the right to preserve the instant judgment amount, provisionally attached the Non-Party Company’s claim for the present and future construction cost as the Defendant’s current and future construction cost claim against the instant construction works as the U.S. District Court 2013Kadan10083.

(hereinafter “instant provisional attachment”). The instant provisional attachment ruling was served on November 19, 2013 on the Defendant, and the decision of correction as of February 10, 2014 on the said ruling was served on the Defendant on the 12th of the same month, and on the 113th of the same month, the decision of correction as of February 11, 2014 was served on the Defendant, respectively.

E. The Plaintiff (Appointed) and the designated parties shall seize the claims to which the provisional seizure was to be transferred to the provisional seizure under 2014TT 5658, Goyang-gu District Court 2014.