Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On January 9, 2013, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. at the Suwon District Court (the brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence on October 26, 2014.

【Crimes by the Defendants, 2017 Highest 6571, together with the Defendants, agreed to introduce and arrange Thai women to domestic sexual traffic establishments. Defendant B recruited Thai women through a sexual traffic brokerage company located in Thailand, and Defendant A decided to introduce and arrange Thai women recruited to domestic sexual traffic establishments.

1. On June 13, 2017, the Defendants conspired to introduce and arrange to engage in commercial sex acts at the 'D' 'F marina site' located in the 7th floor of the building E when industrialization, the Defendants: (a) received 60,000 won per day from the G operating the said commercial sex acts establishment in return; and (b) from the time to August 30, 2017, the Defendants introduced and arranged to offer commercial sex acts to the women of 24 times in the Republic of Korea, as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes, from the time to August 30, 2017. In response, the Defendants received 28,15,000 won in total.

2. The Defendants are running an employment brokerage business for foreign workers subject to employment restriction. At the same time, from June 22, 2017 to August 21, 2017, the Defendants: H, an alien who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea; from June 22, 2017 to August 21, 2017; I; from June 22, 2017 to August 21, 2017; from June 22, 2017 to August 21, 2017; J; and from July 11, 2017 to July 18, 2017; and received KRW 40,00 to 60,000 per foreigner.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange the employment of foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea.

3. The Defendants of embezzlement do not speak at the victim J of the said “F Marina” establishment.