logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.11 2017고단5834
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After leasing the Seo-gu Btel 306 and 422, the Defendant publicizeds that he is a commercial sex business establishment through the Internet site C, and operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called "E" by employing women engaged in sexual sex trafficking such as D, and had the above female employees engage in sexual sex trafficking by having them see the sexual organ of male customers under the above conditions.

From the end of April 2017 to July 7, 2017, the Defendant received 80,000 won in return for the teaching of similarity from his/her nameless customers from the above business establishment and gave guidance to the relevant heading room, and let the said female employees associate with the customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is to recognize and reflect his mistake, to constitute an initial crime with no record of criminal punishment, and to the amount of actual benefit.

It is judged as ordered in consideration of the appearance of sexual traffic, the attitude of sexual traffic, and all other factors of sentencing.

arrow