A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name called "D Magaz shop shop" at Gwangju Mine-gu C and the third floor.

From December 1, 2016 to December 20, 2016, the Defendant employed E and F at the above business establishment from around December 1, 2016 to around the 20th of the same month, received KRW 8 to 100,000 in return for the act of similarity that enables customers to see the sexual organ of customers by hand or scam, and let the said female employees to scam with customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Entry of each statement in the police interrogation protocol with respect to E or F;

1. Each entry into the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to descriptions of copies of a place of business;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act: No. 1 and No. 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic, Etc., No. 3, 4 and 5 of the said Act: No. 25 of the said Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection: Provided, That investigation reports based on recognition (report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is very harsh to repeat the crime.

Defendant is also guilty of suspended sentence.

However, the scale of the crime is small, the period of the crime is short, and the defendant has no same criminal record.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.