logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.27 2014나70503
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: (a) Nos. 3, 15, and 18; and (b) such part of the reasoning of the judgment is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 402

[Supplementary part] "However, there is negligence of walking the deceased on the right side of the road on the road without distinction between the roadway and India, and considering the fact that the accident site is a one-lane road where there is little space for walking on the outside of the road, it is reasonable to consider the deceased's negligence as 10%, so the defendant's responsibility is limited to 90%."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow