logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.06.09 2019나14226
매매대금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the principal lawsuit shall be modified as follows.

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The third half of the judgment of the first instance court in the second half of the judgment in the second instance shall be written with the "Sisher Shacker" as "Sisher Shacker".

Part 4 of the decision of the first instance court "2,00,000" shall be applied "22,00,000".

The following shall be added between the fourth and sixth of the decision of the first instance.

A person shall be appointed.

F. The instant machinery is currently kept in the Plaintiff’s domicile.

[The fourth 20th 20th 1st 20th 20th 20th 1st 20th 20th 20th 1st 20th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 200 2th 1st 1st 1st 200 2th 2th 1st 15th 6th 15th 7th 7th 18th 2th 1st 200 2th 202th 205th 2015 206th 2015th 2016 206th 205th 200 206th 202 of the 1st 2th 2012 2th 204th 204th 205 of the 2nd 2016th 3th 1st 204th 205 of the 2nd 1st 2015th 2th 24th 2015.

) The possibility of recovery of each of the above expenditure costs is as there is no data to know whether the terms and conditions of the contract regarding the supply of the aggregate (such as the time limit of delivery or the cancellation thereof) between the Plaintiff and H association.

arrow