logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.27 2014나67439
손해배상(자)
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: (a) No. 4, No. 2, and No. 11 are as stated in the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary parts] The defendant alleged that he was negligent in operating the center line without wearing a safety mother even to the deceased. However, in light of the overall purport of the arguments, it can be recognized that the deceased was wearing a safety mother in accordance with the statements No. 18-6 and No. 13, and there is no counter-proof, and there is no evidence to deem that the deceased was operating the center line in her course. Thus, there is no negligence on the deceased. Accordingly, the defendant's liability for damages shall not be limited."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow