logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.17 2015고단7937
사기
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B of fine of 1,700,000 won, Defendant C of fine of 1,200,000 won, and Defendant D of this case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, and Defendant J are the next owners of individual cargo vehicles.

L is a petroleum retailer operating the “N gas station” in Incheon Metropolitan City M, and theO is an employee of the director in charge of the general affairs of the above N gas station.

The Defendants conspired with L/O by having the aforementioned O, etc. pay the subsidy welfare card as if they want to pass through the cargo vehicle eligible for the subsidy in a normal manner, such as divating the details of transactions, and manipulating the details of transactions.

1. According to Defendant A’s above public invitation, around August 2, 2011, around 06:29, the Defendant filed a claim for a fuel subsidy with the Gu Office of Incheon Metropolitan City among the victims by paying the amount of a fuel subsidy to the saidO, etc., as if the Defendant’s fuel payment in the freight vehicle (P) via the Defendant’s fuel payment vehicle (P) was limited to KRW 194.19 liter, and theO, etc. paid the amount of KRW 351,500.

However, since the defendant's cargo 172.1 liter's fuel oil 172.1 liter's fuel oil was 22.09 liter's oil, and around that time, the defendant received gasoline amounting to the difference amounting to 22.09 liter's oil amounting to 1,180 liter's x 40,000 won) from the defendant's automobile.

As such, the Defendant, as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (Ⅱ -A) from around April 4, 2015, including the fact that the Defendant was paid a full subsidy of KRW 7,636,00 by deceiving the victim, provided oil to a general vehicle that is not a type of subsidy, not a type of subsidy.

arrow