(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고단4014

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고단4014

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. in Busan District Court's Dong Branch, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 29, 2014, and on July 16, 2014, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 28, 2014.

1. On January 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 13:20, the Defendant: (b) leased the Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, mobile phone number, address, driver’s license number, etc. on the lessee’s name, and signed D’s name in the lessee’s signature column, with a view to exercising the Plaintiff’s license, at the office of the LASK, which is on the 583 and 2nd floor, as the number of the Plaintiff’s 583 and 2nd floor, without authority.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a vehicle rental contract in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, submitted the forged vehicle rental contract to the person who was unaware of the circumstances, and exercised it as if it was duly formed.

3. The Defendant on unlawful uttering of official document presented his driver’s license as if he were his own driver’s license for the purpose of confirming the lessee’s qualification in leasing a motor vehicle at the same date, time, and place as in the above Paragraph 1, for the purpose of confirming the lessee’s qualification.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a public document, exercised his driver's license against D issued by the Commissioner of the Ulsan National Police Agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A motor vehicle registration certificate or a forged motor vehicle rental contract;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (written confirmations); and

참조조문

-마약류 관리에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2019.01.25 2018고단6488

-의정부지방법원 2015.11.23 2015고정1737

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.03.25 2013고단639

-서울남부지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고정1460

-대전지방법원 2021.03.16 2020고정1067