beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around 09:20 on September 30, 2016, the Defendant brought about KRW 319,000 in the ELGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGF’s 1 point at KRW 179,00,00 in the market price of KRW 179,00 and KRW 179,00 in the market price of KRW 179,00 in the ELGGGGGGGF’s 1 point at KRW 1,79,00 in the market price of KRW 179,00,00 in the ELGGGGG’s 179,00 in the market price of KRW 1,349,00 in the eLGGGG’s 1,00 in the market price of KRW 349,00 in the eLGGG’s 340,000 in the market price of KRW 10,016 in the GGG.
Defendant A of "2016 High Court Decision 2285" is a non-permanent position.
On 13:23 on 01, 208, the Defendant: (a) in the Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, and the victim H (34 years of age and female) displayed in a store with a single eye, in the second underground floor G store of the F department store, was stolen by using a 43,000 red fluor, a market price of KRW 43,00,000, which was displayed in a store with a single eye.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 High Court Decision 2237"
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. "Investigation report (i.e., recovery of damaged articles and attachment of photographs of damaged articles)";
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A H statement;
1. Investigation report (related to attachment, such as field photographs);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (comprehensive details of a vehicle and related to the owner's currency);
1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The defendant asserts that the defendant was in a state of mental disability at the time of committing each of the crimes in this case, as to the defendant's claim of mental disability under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Top, this Court has duly adopted it.