logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 27. 선고 2018두40300 판결
(심리불속행) 명의위장 사실을 알지 못한 데에 과실이 없다고 할 수 없음[일부패소]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2017-Nu-23643 ( October 30, 2018)

Title

(ps) No person shall be deemed to have been negligent due to his/her failure to know the fact of a false name.

Summary

(C) Article 13(1) of the former Commercial Act provides that a business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business owner’s business; and

Related statutes

The calculation of tax amount, etc. under Article 37 of the Value-Added Tax Act, and tax amount deducted under Article 38

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2018Du40300 Decided revocation of withholding

Plaintiff-Appellant

-Appellee

AAAA Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

-Appellant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2017Nu23643 Decided March 30, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

July 27, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow