beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny in the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch, and on October 7, 2010, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Jung-gu prison on October 7, 2010, and on February 15, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 3, 2013.
1. On May 2012, the Defendant, through the Internet hosting site called “5678 club”, committed with the property of the victim who is a divorced woman as the property with which he/she is divorced and divorced from his/her wife, with the intent to obtain money by deceiving the victim as if he/she had married life by preparing a scambling house after going through a marriage.
around May 2012, the Defendant found the victim to work at the victim's workplace located in the Si of Pakistan, and introduced a false statement to the effect that "a public official of the Rural Development Administration is scheduled to retire on August 2012, and if he retires, he is expected to open the SK K KK station at the Gyeonggi-do audience," and concluded that "a person married with his wife and divorced with his wife, as he is married in Korea, as D is the head of the Gyeonggi Gyeonggi-do Police Station, and is aware of many of the public prosecutors and criminal charges." On the other hand, around June 2012, the Defendant tried to recover money that has been invested in the investment fraud." On the other hand, the Defendant displayed the fact that "a person was the victim after marriage to the same time, it is necessary to prepare for mixed-use apartment, such as home appliances, etc., and if he borrowed money to the victim for sale and purchase, he would have to make up for the change of the amount of money to the owner's house to be sold and sold."
‘Falsely speaking to the effect that ‘’ was false.
However, the defendant did not have worked as a public official of the Rural Development Administration, and there was no dynamics who are D or who are the chief of the police station, and there was no divorce after marriage with his wife around May 27, 1975.