logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.24 2016구합20069
파면처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on September 4, 199, and was promoted to a slope on March 7, 2006, and April 1, 2012, respectively. From January 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was a police officer working for the Department of Security at the same police station police station from May 20, 2015, while serving in B police station life safety and C police box, and D police station.

B. On June 22, 2015, the Defendant imposed two times the removal and disciplinary surcharge (1,770,000 won) on the Plaintiff pursuant to Articles 78(1)1 and 78(2)1 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56, 57, 58, 61, and 63 of the former State Public Officials Act (amended by Act No. 13288, May 18, 2015; hereinafter “State Public Officials Act”).

(2) The case holding that the obstruction of performance of official duties should be unfairly agreed upon by police officers on March 13, 2015, on the ground that (i) the taxi engineer (E58 years old), who was a suspect of the assault incident (E58 years old), was insulting from the above F while serving as the personal protection official of F (E58 years old), and (ii) the aforementioned F (E), after attending the zone as of March 18:30, 2015 and preparing a statement of the Plaintiff’s insult against the above E, who was a witness of the assault case on March 18, 2015, and (iii) the removal and imposition of the disciplinary surcharge in this case, and (iv) the removal and imposition of the disciplinary surcharge in this case.

arrow